LLM Architecture for Startups: Practical Patterns That Scale

Your AI stack architecture determines how fast you can iterate, how much you'll spend, and whether your AI features can scale. Here are the patterns that work.

Aravind Srinivas

Early engineer at Rupa Health • Founder & CEO, HyperNest Labs

1. Core Architecture Patterns

Most startup LLM architectures follow one of three patterns:

Pattern A: Direct API

Frontend → Backend → LLM API. Simplest pattern, works for most use cases. Add an abstraction layer when you need to switch providers.

Pattern B: Queue-Based

Frontend → Backend → Queue → Worker → LLM. Use when AI calls are slow or expensive and users can tolerate async responses.

Pattern C: Agent Loop

Backend → LLM → Tool Execution → LLM → ... Use for complex multi-step tasks. Requires careful timeout and cost management.

Start with Pattern A. Move to B or C only when you have a specific reason.

2. Prompt Management at Scale

Prompts are code. Treat them that way:

  • Version control prompts: Store in your repo, not in the database or LLM provider dashboard.
  • Template system: Use a templating library (Jinja2, Handlebars) for dynamic prompt assembly.
  • Typed inputs: Define TypeScript/Python interfaces for prompt variables to catch errors at compile time.
  • A/B testing: Build infrastructure to run multiple prompt versions in production with metrics.

3. Context Window Strategies

Context windows are your most precious resource:

  • Measure usage: Log token counts for every call. Know where your context budget goes.
  • Summarize aggressively: For long conversations, periodically summarize older messages into a single context block.
  • Prioritize recency: Recent context usually matters more than old context. Implement sliding windows.
  • Chunk intelligently: When splitting documents, overlap chunks by 10-20% to preserve context at boundaries.

4. Caching and Cost Optimization

LLM APIs are expensive. Caching is essential:

  • Semantic caching: Cache based on prompt similarity, not exact match. Similar questions get similar answers.
  • Prefix caching: When prompts share common prefixes, cache the prefix processing. Some providers support this natively.
  • Response caching: For deterministic queries (temperature=0), cache the full response.
  • Embedding caching: Embedding calls are cheaper than completions. Cache embeddings aggressively.

A well-implemented cache can reduce LLM costs by 40-70%.

5. RAG Architecture Decisions

Retrieval-Augmented Generation requires several decisions:

  • Vector store: Pinecone for simplicity, pgvector for PostgreSQL shops, Weaviate for hybrid search.
  • Chunking strategy: 500-1000 tokens with overlap works for most text. Adjust based on your content structure.
  • Hybrid search: Combine vector similarity with keyword search. Neither alone is sufficient.
  • Reranking: Retrieve more candidates than needed, then use a reranker model to pick the best.

6. Multi-Model Routing

Smart startups use different models for different tasks:

  • GPT-4/Claude for complex: Reasoning, analysis, nuanced writing.
  • GPT-3.5/Claude Haiku for simple: Classification, extraction, simple formatting.
  • Specialized models: Use dedicated models for embeddings, image generation, speech.
  • Fallback chains: When primary model fails or times out, fall back to alternatives.

Build a router abstraction from day one. You will change models more than you expect.

Need help with your AI architecture?

Let's review your current setup and plan the next iteration.

Book a 30-min Call