Written by Aravind Srinivas, early engineer at Rupa Health and Founder & CEO of HyperNest Labs.
One of the most common questions early-stage founders ask: should I hire a founding engineer or a CTO? The answer depends on your stage, your product, and what you actually need built.
Founding Engineer: A senior IC (individual contributor) who joins early, ships product, and operates with founder-level context. They write code daily, make architecture decisions pragmatically, and don't require management. They're builders first.
CTO: A technical leader responsible for engineering strategy, team building, and representing technology to the board and investors. CTOs at early stages often code, but their primary value is in leadership, hiring, and technical vision.
| Responsibility | Founding Engineer | CTO |
|---|---|---|
| Daily coding | ✅ Primary activity | ⚠️ Varies by stage |
| Architecture decisions | ✅ Pragmatic, shipping-focused | ✅ Strategic, scalability-focused |
| Hiring engineers | ⚠️ Helps interview | ✅ Owns hiring strategy |
| Board/investor updates | ❌ Rarely involved | ✅ Regular responsibility |
| Team management | ❌ IC role | ✅ Primary responsibility |
| Technical debt decisions | ✅ Makes tradeoffs daily | ✅ Sets policy |
At many successful startups, the first founding engineer eventually becomes the CTO — but not always. Some founding engineers prefer to stay as ICs and hire a CTO above them. Others grow into the CTO role organically.
The key insight: these are different skill sets. A great founding engineer ships fast and makes pragmatic tradeoffs. A great CTO builds teams, communicates with stakeholders, and thinks about 2-3 year technical horizons.
At Rupa Health, we had founding engineers who were critical to shipping the early product, but also needed experienced technical leadership as the team grew to 20+ engineers.