Insight

How Betting.com scaled its platform infrastructure

Betting.com operates in a high-stakes environment where uptime, latency, and data accuracy directly impact revenue. This write-up focuses on the engineering patterns that enabled the platform to scale while maintaining the reliability and performance that users and partners expect—patterns that other high-volume, real-time platforms can reuse.

Written by Aravind Srinivas, early engineer at Rupa Health and Founder & CEO of HyperNest Labs. This article reflects public information and operator perspective—no speculation on confidential details.

Table of contents

The high-volume, real-time constraints

Betting platforms face unique scaling challenges: traffic spikes during major sporting events, constantly changing odds data, and strict requirements around data accuracy and latency. A single incorrect calculation or delayed update can impact user trust and revenue.

The engineering work focused on making the system predictable under unpredictable load: queues to smooth traffic bursts, caching strategies that balance freshness with performance, and observability that surfaces issues before they become user-facing problems.

Reliability patterns that other platforms can borrow

Degraded modes: When systems are under stress, the platform gracefully degrades non-critical features rather than failing entirely.
Circuit breakers: Automatic failover and retry logic prevent cascading failures when external dependencies are slow or unavailable.
Performance budgets: Clear latency targets for each user-facing operation, with alerts when budgets are exceeded.
Incident response playbooks: Documented procedures for common failure modes, so the team can respond quickly without guessing.

These patterns aren't unique to betting platforms—they apply to any high-volume, real-time system where reliability directly impacts business outcomes.

Data accuracy and consistency at scale

For betting platforms, data accuracy isn't just a nice-to-have—it's a business requirement. That means:

Clear data lineage: knowing where each piece of data came from and how it was transformed
Validation at every layer: catching errors early in the pipeline rather than at the user-facing surface
Reconciliation processes: automated checks that compare data across systems to catch inconsistencies
Audit trails: logs and metrics that make it possible to trace issues back to their source

These practices are especially important for platforms operating in regulated industries or preparing for acquisition, where data integrity becomes a diligence focus.

Scaling lessons for other high-volume platforms

If you're building a platform that needs to handle high-volume, real-time data:

Invest in observability early: You can't fix what you can't see. Dashboards, alerts, and logs should be built into the system from day one, not added as an afterthought.
Design for failure: Assume components will fail and build graceful degradation paths. This is especially important for platforms that depend on external data sources or APIs.
Make performance a feature: Latency and reliability aren't just infrastructure concerns—they're product features that directly impact user experience and revenue.
Document your architecture: Clear diagrams and decision records make it easier to onboard new engineers, respond to incidents, and prepare for diligence.

For teams building similar platforms, see our fractional CTO for startups or explore founding engineers for early-stage support.

How Betting.com scaled its platform infrastructure

The high-volume, real-time constraints

Reliability patterns that other platforms can borrow

Data accuracy and consistency at scale

Scaling lessons for other high-volume platforms

Related reading

Case study

Service

More insights

Product

Legal